[ Documentation · 02 / 08 ]
Ten mandates
A vault is one strategy, one risk tier and one portfolio. The ten differ in what they buy, how long they hold it and what a loss inside them can reach. The full table, with deployed capital, carrying mark and position count.
01
A vault is a strategy with a boundary. Four things define one, and all four are published before a member can allocate to it.
A vault holds its positions directly. It does not lend to another vault, does not net against another vault's book, and cannot be gated to fund another vault's redemption. Reserve is the only vault that funds the others, and it does so by holding $132.7M in cash and tokenised bills rather than by drawing on anyone.
Every vault publishes its own mandate and its own risk statement. Those sit on the vault's page at /vaults/<name>. This document is the comparison across all of them.
02
Sorted by risk tier ascending, then by deployed capital descending inside a tier — the same order as the vault index and the same order the prev/next navigation runs in.
| # | Vault | Tier | Deployed | Mark | Positions | Members | Lock-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Reserve Capital Preservation | R1 | $132.7M | 1.02× | 0 | 96 | None. Same-epoch exit |
| 02 | Anchor Late Stage | R2 | $412.6M | 1.14× | 6 | 284 | 24 months |
| 03 | Shield Downside Protected | R2 | $141.8M | 1.15× | 4 | 118 | 18 months |
| 04 | Perpetual Evergreen Core | R3 | $338.0M | 1.39× | 6 | 231 | Evergreen |
| 05 | Structure Structured Exposure | R3 | $214.9M | 1.24× | 5 | 142 | 36 months |
| 06 | Compound Reinvested Gains | R3 | $84.3M | 1.33× | 5 | 61 | 12 months |
| 07 | Keystone Concentrated Conviction | R4 | $286.4M | 1.62× | 10 | 84 | 48 months |
| 08 | Momentum Secondaries | R4 | $167.2M | 1.51× | 7 | 109 | 12 months |
| 09 | Frontier Deep Tech | R5 | $118.5M | 1.96× | 6 | 78 | 60 months |
| 10 | Genesis Earliest Stage | R5 | $43.6M | 2.74× | 6 | 37 | 84 months |
Deployed capital sums to $1.94B. Reserve shows zero positions because it owns no private company — it is the cash sleeve.
03
Four axes separate the mandates. A vault is usually distinctive on one of them and ordinary on the rest.
Two of the 10 are structural rather than directional, and they are the reason the other eight can behave the way they do.
04
Capacity is a per-vault parameter, not a House total. The ten stated capacities sum to $2510.0M and $1.94B is deployed against them — 77.3%.
Because it is per vault, one vault can be closed while others stay open. Keystone is the fullest at 84.2% of $340.0M; Genesis is the emptiest at 54.5% of $80.0M. A vault that reaches its capacity stops accepting new capital at the next window and stays closed until governance raises the ceiling, which moves on an epoch boundary like every other parameter.
| Vault | Deployed | Capacity | Utilisation | Open since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reserve | $132.7M | $180.0M | 73.7% | Epoch 00 |
| Anchor | $412.6M | $500.0M | 82.5% | Epoch 01 |
| Shield | $141.8M | $190.0M | 74.6% | Epoch 02 |
| Perpetual | $338.0M | $420.0M | 80.5% | Epoch 01 |
| Structure | $214.9M | $275.0M | 78.1% | Epoch 02 |
| Compound | $84.3M | $140.0M | 60.2% | Epoch 03 |
| Keystone | $286.4M | $340.0M | 84.2% | Epoch 01 |
| Momentum | $167.2M | $220.0M | 76% | Epoch 02 |
| Frontier | $118.5M | $165.0M | 71.8% | Epoch 02 |
| Genesis | $43.6M | $80.0M | 54.5% | Epoch 00 |
Capacity is a risk control, not a sales target
A vault's capacity is set against the opportunity it can actually underwrite, not against the capital that would like to enter. Frontier is capped at $165.0M because deep tech diligence is slow and it has taken six rounds out of twenty-five reviewed since Epoch 02. Raising a capacity without raising the deal flow behind it is how a good strategy becomes an average one.
05
A company can sit in more than one vault. That is not double counting: each vault holds its own position, sized against its own book and marked on its own terms. A late-stage name can be a core holding in Anchor and one of the ten conviction slots in Keystone at the same time, for different reasons and at different sizes.
| Company | Category | Position | Held by |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anduril | Frontier | $162.7M | Perpetual · Frontier · Anchor · Keystone |
| Vercel | Data & tooling | $82.1M | Perpetual · Shield · Anchor · Keystone |
| Ramp | Fintech | $118.3M | Shield · Anchor · Keystone |
| Perplexity | Applied AI | $104.6M | Anchor · Momentum · Keystone |
| Groq | Compute & infrastructure | $96.4M | Perpetual · Anchor · Keystone |
| Mistral | Models | $92.5M | Perpetual · Anchor · Keystone |
| Harvey | Applied AI | $78.4M | Structure · Momentum · Keystone |
| Sierra | Applied AI | $63.2M | Genesis · Momentum · Compound |
| Physical Intelligence | Frontier | $61.8M | Genesis · Frontier · Keystone |
| Cognition | Applied AI | $58.7M | Genesis · Momentum · Compound |
| Clay | Data & tooling | $39.7M | Genesis · Structure · Compound |
Active companies held by three or more vaults. The full list of holdings is on the portfolio.
The relation is built from each vault's own holdings list rather than typed twice, so a company can never claim a vault the vault does not claim back. If a position is not in the vault's published holdings, the vault does not hold it.
06
The vault is the decision. Read the tier first and the mandate second.
Neither extreme is the default
Reserve is not a safe place to leave an allocation — it earns a bill yield and nothing else, and holding it is a decision to be out of the market. Genesis is not where a first allocation belongs. The book is weighted to R2 and R3 for the same reason most allocations should be: those are the tiers where a wrong answer costs a return rather than a principal.